<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RIA &#8211; Ajax versus Flash guesswork</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vijucat.wordpress.com/2005/11/17/ria-ajax-versus-flash-guesswork/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vijucat.wordpress.com/2005/11/17/ria-ajax-versus-flash-guesswork/</link>
	<description>Transforming coffee to code since 1974</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 22:19:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: vijucat</title>
		<link>http://vijucat.wordpress.com/2005/11/17/ria-ajax-versus-flash-guesswork/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>vijucat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 03:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vijucat.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-101</guid>
		<description>Hassan, I see your point about Flash being compiled. I, too, hate the fact that Ctrl-F (for example) doesn&#039;t work over all the text inside a Flash app.

I think Adobe has the resources and talent to solve this part of the puzzle and make text inside SWFs indexable by search robots, but being a big corporation, ideas take time to become reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hassan, I see your point about Flash being compiled. I, too, hate the fact that Ctrl-F (for example) doesn&#8217;t work over all the text inside a Flash app.</p>
<p>I think Adobe has the resources and talent to solve this part of the puzzle and make text inside SWFs indexable by search robots, but being a big corporation, ideas take time to become reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hassan</title>
		<link>http://vijucat.wordpress.com/2005/11/17/ria-ajax-versus-flash-guesswork/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Hassan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 19:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vijucat.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-96</guid>
		<description>my feeling is that the web is about text UIs, text is easy to write, easy to index, easy to link to..., plug a compiled object into a web page and y&#039;re off standards, bots won&#039;t be  indexing your content,  search engine giants won&#039;t be very happy..., and overall, any excessive use of non text content over the web harms it&#039;s initial intent.

so my bet is the search giants won&#039;t let flex gui&#039;s get too much ahead of text based gui&#039;s like ajax and w&#039;ll see very strong AJAX frameworks released to the public very soon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my feeling is that the web is about text UIs, text is easy to write, easy to index, easy to link to&#8230;, plug a compiled object into a web page and y&#8217;re off standards, bots won&#8217;t be  indexing your content,  search engine giants won&#8217;t be very happy&#8230;, and overall, any excessive use of non text content over the web harms it&#8217;s initial intent.</p>
<p>so my bet is the search giants won&#8217;t let flex gui&#8217;s get too much ahead of text based gui&#8217;s like ajax and w&#8217;ll see very strong AJAX frameworks released to the public very soon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mansu</title>
		<link>http://vijucat.wordpress.com/2005/11/17/ria-ajax-versus-flash-guesswork/#comment-1</link>
		<dc:creator>mansu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vijucat.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-1</guid>
		<description>I am reading loads and loads of stuff on Ajax and i feel that these companies are just reinventing the wheel or Old wine in a New bottle.

There is one thing which everyone i saw ignored.There were UI&#039;s in the .Com boom that were either written in Java or using activeX.Atleast on IE i have seen some good UI being designed.(Though i am not sure if they used anything more). But i feel that ActiveX is a good idea that was badly executed, because being able to control devices from anywhere using the internet is really cool.

But i feel that down the line Ajax hype will cool down when we get many players providing good UI&#039;s. But after that people will come back and think about what MS is planning to do. Atleast , if you want to do things you see in MS ad&#039;s, the web is just a peice of the puzzle. 

I may be very wrong in my speculation, but if i were the user 5 years down the line, i do not think Ajax will satisfy me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am reading loads and loads of stuff on Ajax and i feel that these companies are just reinventing the wheel or Old wine in a New bottle.</p>
<p>There is one thing which everyone i saw ignored.There were UI&#8217;s in the .Com boom that were either written in Java or using activeX.Atleast on IE i have seen some good UI being designed.(Though i am not sure if they used anything more). But i feel that ActiveX is a good idea that was badly executed, because being able to control devices from anywhere using the internet is really cool.</p>
<p>But i feel that down the line Ajax hype will cool down when we get many players providing good UI&#8217;s. But after that people will come back and think about what MS is planning to do. Atleast , if you want to do things you see in MS ad&#8217;s, the web is just a peice of the puzzle. </p>
<p>I may be very wrong in my speculation, but if i were the user 5 years down the line, i do not think Ajax will satisfy me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
